Skip to main content

Benedict XVI's Pathetic Attempt to Excuse Clerical Sex Abuse


Ex-Pope Benedict XVI has published a letter in a German magazine making one of the most distasteful, poorly judged and ill-informed claims I've ever heard. He blames clerical sex abuse on the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

The social changes of the 60s and early 70s resulted from improvements in and availability of contraception. This enabled consenting heterosexual adults of all ages (and near-adults) to express their sexuality with little fear of unwanted pregnancy. No doubt the increased financial independence of women over the preceding twenty-five years was also a factor. Neither of those drivers changed attitudes towards paedophilia or rape. (Except maybe women's increased independence made rape even less acceptable.) Indeed, fifty years on those things are still taboo in the wider society. Benedict claims that the sexual revolution led to paedophilia being "diagnosed as allowed and appropriate". Well, not outside of the Catholic Church it didn't!

He also claims that the sexual revolution led to "homosexual cliques" in seminaries. That is so ridiculous as to need little critique, but just in case you are inclined to believe anything a Pope says: how could any rational person believe that homosexuality in seminaries began in the 60s? It is only recently that the spotlight has changed sufficiently for victims to put themselves through the trauma of describing what happened to them as children, but even so some allegations date back to decades before the 1960s. There is little doubt that clerical abuse has been widespread for a very long time.

If those claims weren't sickening enough, he went on to say that the only solution is "obedience and love for our Lord Jesus Christ". Wrong. A pretty good solution would be to remove perpetrators from positions of authority. Instead of which the Catholic Church has regularly acquiesced in the criminality and frequently covered it up. Indeed, the Church was often complicit in encouraging it by moving the criminals away from growing calls of outrage, to new parishes where they could continue to fiddle with children and rape them.

I suppose in this post-truth era we are getting inured to baseless claims no matter how facile, but Benedict's nonsense is particularly galling as he is widely suspected of suppressing investigations into clerical abuse.

Popular posts from this blog

Covering Your Router In Aluminium Foil

A friend was given a suggestion by someone from IT to alleviate network connection issues. The suggestion is to wrap their router in "tin foil". When they'd finished laughing, they called me for an opinion. Assuming they meant ordinary aluminium kitchen foil, the suggestion is ludicrous. The best you might hope for is that it doesn't make any difference. If it has any affect it would surely be to act as a Faraday cage, keeping external radiation out and internal radiation in. I decided to test it. I performed six throughput runs alternating between uncovered and loosely covered with a folded sheet of kitchen foil. Each run consisted of three one-minute trials, where TCP upstream and downstream speeds were averaged using TamoSoft Throughput. The server was my development PC upstairs; the client a downstairs laptop two metres from the router. Both were connected on the 5GHz WiFi band. Here are the results. The best you can say for the foil is tha...

BBC Cowering Before Right-Wing Authoritarianism

Gary Lineker is of course right in everything he says about the government's asylum policy. There are two issues. First, should a regular presenter be restricted from political comment outside the confines of their role, in the interests of public broadcast impartiality? The answer is obvious, and you would have thought that the BBC had learnt its lesson when it ended up apologizing for censuring Naga Munchetty for heartfelt comments on Donald Trump's blatant racism, following a public and internal outcry over her treatment. Munchetty's comments were made on a live BBC broadcast. Lineker's comments were off-air on his private social media account. Nobody is in any doubt that the comments are Lineker's rather than the BBC's. Second, how circumspect should anyone be about comparing right wing nationalism with the political ideology of the Nazis? The answer is very. But Lineker has indeed been cautious in his language. I pointed out myself in the lead-up to the...

Boris Johnson is a Pathological Liar

When I was a teenager, our class were caught gambling and the head decided to cane us. He lined us up to ask each child if they were involved. Nobody lied; the idea of dishonesty was much worse than the fear of corporal punishment. Boris Johnson is the exact opposite: a pathological liar; a delinquent who derives psychological satisfaction from the slightest deceit; from getting one over on people. And he covers up any exposed mendacity with further fabrications. He was unanimously found guilty of lying to the Head of State by eleven Supreme Court judges. He was fired from his job as a journalist for a campaign of systematic lies about the EU over a prolonged period and after multiple warnings. He conspired to deceive the nation before the Brexit vote with deliberately misleading financial propaganda, when the Treasury's own forecast for leaving was for significant long-term financial disadvantage. He knowingly lied about the difficulty of getting a Brexit settlement with the EU. W...