Skip to main content

Boris Johnson is a Pathological Liar

When I was a teenager, our class were caught gambling and the head decided to cane us. He lined us up to ask each child if they were involved. Nobody lied; the idea of dishonesty was much worse than the fear of corporal punishment.

Boris Johnson is the exact opposite: a pathological liar; a delinquent who derives psychological satisfaction from the slightest deceit; from getting one over on people. And he covers up any exposed mendacity with further fabrications.

He was unanimously found guilty of lying to the Head of State by eleven Supreme Court judges. He was fired from his job as a journalist for a campaign of systematic lies about the EU over a prolonged period and after multiple warnings. He conspired to deceive the nation before the Brexit vote with deliberately misleading financial propaganda, when the Treasury's own forecast for leaving was for significant long-term financial disadvantage. He knowingly lied about the difficulty of getting a Brexit settlement with the EU.

When he started holding daily COVID briefings I began by eagerly tuning in to play the game of 'what lies is he going to spout today', but I quickly found his misrepresentations sickening and farcical.

When it was becoming clear that he had set the tone in Downing Street for dozens of illegal gatherings during lockdown and participated in some himself, he lied and lied and lied to parliament about the existence of the parties, then their nature, and then his presence at them.

He systematically misled us about his knowledge of misconduct claims against Chris Pincher, in a debauched spiral of ever more transparent lies. This culminated in the ridiculous claim that when he appointed Pincher as deputy chief whip, he simply forgot that the man had been found guilty of predatory sexual misconduct while at the Foreign Office.



I wrote all that yesterday, and today he is announcing his resignation. The lies have become so ludicrous that the party had no choice but to force him out – there is simply too much buyer’s remorse out there amongst the electorate. More than fifty government ministers and aides had to quit their posts to get rid of him.

But the culture of dishonesty and deception is established. Time and again ministers have appeared in the media repeating Johnson's lies, and there is a worry that the habit of duplicity and distortion has metastasized to the whole party and beyond. I'm not talking about political spin where politicians represent events in the best light to support their position: something we expect from them. I'm talking about the government of the UK spreading deliberate and calculated misinformation to the British public. That is not something we should accept. I disagreed with almost everything Margaret Thatcher did, but I think she honestly believed what she said. I hope we can get back to at least a semblance of integrity. Because an assumption of barefaced lying at the top of government can only go one way, and that is downwards. We have the evidence of what happens in the recent history across the pond. Large numbers of Trump supporters were so immersed in a morass of deceit that they ended up lying to themselves about what was going on, ending in a riotous physical attack on the institution of government.

Popular posts from this blog

BBC Cowering Before Right-Wing Authoritarianism

Gary Lineker is of course right in everything he says about the government's asylum policy. There are two issues. First, should a regular presenter be restricted from political comment outside the confines of their role, in the interests of public broadcast impartiality? The answer is obvious, and you would have thought that the BBC had learnt its lesson when it ended up apologizing for censuring Naga Munchetty for heartfelt comments on Donald Trump's blatant racism, following a public and internal outcry over her treatment. Munchetty's comments were made on a live BBC broadcast. Lineker's comments were off-air on his private social media account. Nobody is in any doubt that the comments are Lineker's rather than the BBC's. Second, how circumspect should anyone be about comparing right wing nationalism with the political ideology of the Nazis? The answer is very. But Lineker has indeed been cautious in his language. I pointed out myself in the lead-up to the

Covering Your Router In Aluminium Foil

A friend was given a suggestion by someone from IT to alleviate network connection issues. The suggestion is to wrap their router in "tin foil". When they'd finished laughing, they called me for an opinion. Assuming they meant ordinary aluminium kitchen foil, the suggestion is ludicrous. The best you might hope for is that it doesn't make any difference. If it has any affect it would surely be to act as a Faraday cage, keeping external radiation out and internal radiation in. I decided to test it. I performed six throughput runs alternating between uncovered and loosely covered with a folded sheet of kitchen foil. Each run consisted of three one-minute trials, where TCP upstream and downstream speeds were averaged using TamoSoft Throughput. The server was my development PC upstairs; the client a downstairs laptop two metres from the router. Both were connected on the 5GHz WiFi band. Here are the results. The best you can say for the foil is tha