Skip to main content

Sexism and Islam

We often hear Muslims of both sexes parroting that Muslim women are treated equally, and I have commented before about how this is at odds with much of what we see. It really does appear to be a veneer of disingenuous obfuscation. But sometimes the façade slips, and we see the true prejudices unmasked and undiluted.

Last month the Hudson Islamic Centre in upstate New York had a high-profile ground breaking ceremony for a new mosque after years of praying in a basement. Local dignitaries were invited, speeches made, and the project unveiled. The entire community of mostly first-generation Bangladeshis had been invited. Unless you were female.

One of the local Muslim women, Jabin Ahmed Ruhii, was frustrated enough to expose the farcical situation on social media, and a storm blew up. The president of the Islamic Centre, Abdul Hannan, said that no discrimination is allowed in their mosque or religious ceremonies. Are you ready for what he said next?

He explained with no hint of embarrassment that the lack of women at the ceremony was due to a lack of space. That’s right – if there is limited space then all men come before all women. To him that is not discrimination.

Many will not have read the Quran and, again, may have heard Muslims claiming that it beseeches equitable treatment for women. That is so far from the truth to be called a deliberate and intentionally deceitful lie. There is whole chapter (Surah 4) on women and I encourage you to read it. Here are some highlights:

  • If you decide to exchange one wife for another, then you should not try to reclaim any gifts from the first wife. [Because presumably you might be tempted to.]
  • If by chance you haven’t had sex with one of your women, then it is okay to have sex with her daughters by another man. [Presumably at any age.]
  • You must not have sex with a married woman unless she is a slave. [Words fail me.]

But just in case you are still in doubt, verse 34 says “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other”. It goes on to say that a woman should be obedient and that a man should beat her if he is worried about even the possibility of disobedience.

This is the book regarded by believers as profoundly holy and irrefutable, and claimed to be the basis for their morals. And no, I am not twisting it or quoting out of context or mistranslating from the Arabic. I leave that to others. I am giving you the plain meaning, free from conceits; the meaning accepted by Islamic clerics and adherents. (The Muslim scholar Laleh Bakhtiar has translated the Quran and bowdlerized out everything that betrays its true barbaric nature. She has removed derogatory references to Christians and Jews, and dishonestly emasculated the reference to beating women.)

Sexism isn’t confined to Muslim communities, but they do seem particularly prone to extreme forms of it. And there is no doubt that these obnoxious views are to many, validated by their religion and by the Quran.

Popular posts from this blog

Boris Johnson is a Pathological Liar

When I was a teenager, our class were caught gambling and the head decided to cane us. He lined us up to ask each child if they were involved. Nobody lied; the idea of dishonesty was much worse than the fear of corporal punishment. Boris Johnson is the exact opposite: a pathological liar; a delinquent who derives psychological satisfaction from the slightest deceit; from getting one over on people. And he covers up any exposed mendacity with further fabrications. He was unanimously found guilty of lying to the Head of State by eleven Supreme Court judges. He was fired from his job as a journalist for a campaign of systematic lies about the EU over a prolonged period and after multiple warnings. He conspired to deceive the nation before the Brexit vote with deliberately misleading financial propaganda, when the Treasury's own forecast for leaving was for significant long-term financial disadvantage. He knowingly lied about the difficulty of getting a Brexit settlement with the EU. W...

Ridiculous Snooker Competition Format

  This year the format for the Championship League Snooker competition is very inequitable. It works like this. There are twenty-five entrants, of which seven are placed in Group 1. They play a round-robin tournament and the top four then play a knockout to decide the winner of the group. The winner qualifies for the Winners Group, and the remaining other four of the top five progress to Group 2, joining three other players from the original twenty-five. The bottom two are eliminated from the competition. This whole process is repeated until Group 7, when only the winner qualifies for the Winners Group, the other six players getting eliminated. The Winners Group then contains the seven players who won a group. Again, they play a round-robin and the top four play a knockout for tournament winner. Players win money by winning frames, getting through to the play-offs, winning a group or being runner-up, and by making the highest break in a group. The rates for these are differen...

Rescuing People from Cults

It isn't hard to imagine a child being brought up by parents within a small community of bizarre cult beliefs. The child would initially accept the programming without question no matter how damaging, because that is what small infants are hard-wired to do. Later they might begin to question the ideas, but everyone they know would profess conviction and it is easy to see the difficulty of snubbing their entire community and becoming a social outcast. If we were able to rescue the victim from the grip of the cult, then even as an adult it would be difficult to reverse the damage. We would need to train the critical thinking skills that all cults must suppress to exist. Our efforts might well look like the popular notion of 'brainwashing'. This is precisely what the Chinese are being accused of with the Uighurs. Some are calling it "psychological torture", and even the BBC are calling it "systematic brainwashing". "Wait a minute," you say, "...