Skip to main content

American Cheating

When a friend of mine told me that the Ryder Cup was about to begin, she was outraged when I casually enquired if the American cheating had started. Golf is supposed to be an oasis of honesty, etiquette, fair play and self-regulation in a sporting desert of deceit and over-enthusiastic gamesmanship. The Ryder Cup is the pinnacle of international competition in the sport, played by professionals in a temporary state of Corinthian amateurism: there is no prize money, only glory. Surely not even Americans would cheat at that?

The 1991 Ryder Cup is notorious for the continued spat between Paul Azinger and Seve Ballesteros. Azinger insisted that he had not been trying to cheat, and Ballesteros retorted, "Oh no. Breaking the rules and cheating are two different things." He thought he was being sarcastic, but actually hit the nail very much on the head. For many Americans breaking the rules and getting away with it is not cheating. For these people the proprieties of a sport are for losers, and etiquette, if it is followed at all, is a calculated façade. Azinger and his partner were knowingly breaking the rules, conspiring to do so, and attempting to conceal the infringement. But they were hoping to get away with it. So when Azinger said, "I can tell you we're not trying to cheat", I think he honestly believed it. The culture of unfair competition is so ingrained in some Americans that they don’t even recognize what they are doing for what it is: cheating pure and simple.

I suspect that many Americans don’t really understand what the British mean by ‘fair play’. I guess they know that there are different weight categories in boxing, but I expect they would regard the idea of height categories in basketball as ludicrous. Whereas the British would probably react that it would be fairer, though possibly impractical.

Back to the Ryder Cup, in 1999 the Americans began the final day with a huge four point deficit. The European players were then subjected to deliberate and sustained spectator barracking of the most disgraceful kind, and the event culminated in a good putt by American Justin Leonard followed by a scandalous prolonged wild over-celebration with players, wives and fans running onto the pitch. But Spaniard José María Olazábal still had a putt to square the competition, and the appalling gamesmanship was deliberately calculated to unnerve him. I make no apology for repeating myself. The culture of unfair competition is so ingrained in some Americans that they don’t even recognize what they are doing for what it is: cheating pure and simple.

Of course it isn’t just Americans who behave like this. Some of the bad feeling in that 1991 Ryder Cup stemmed from inappropriate behaviour from Seve Ballesteros himself, and the Australian cricket team are so frightened of losing that they feel it necessary to barrack opposing batsman in the most discreditable way.

Of course not all Americans are guilty. Jack Nicklaus famously conceded an uncertain two-foot putt to Tony Jacklin in the 1969 Ryder Cup to leave the competition tied. His captain was not pleased. Even in tennis some Americans show good sportsmanship. Andre Agassi and Lindsay Davenport come to mind. But there does seem to be a real difference in culture in Britain and America. British football supporters disdain ‘diving’ even by their own side. I suspect the attitude of American sports fans would be very different.

Popular posts from this blog

Covering Your Router In Aluminium Foil

A friend was given a suggestion by someone from IT to alleviate network connection issues. The suggestion is to wrap their router in "tin foil". When they'd finished laughing, they called me for an opinion. Assuming they meant ordinary aluminium kitchen foil, the suggestion is ludicrous. The best you might hope for is that it doesn't make any difference. If it has any affect it would surely be to act as a Faraday cage, keeping external radiation out and internal radiation in. I decided to test it. I performed six throughput runs alternating between uncovered and loosely covered with a folded sheet of kitchen foil. Each run consisted of three one-minute trials, where TCP upstream and downstream speeds were averaged using TamoSoft Throughput. The server was my development PC upstairs; the client a downstairs laptop two metres from the router. Both were connected on the 5GHz WiFi band. Here are the results. The best you can say for the foil is tha...

BBC Cowering Before Right-Wing Authoritarianism

Gary Lineker is of course right in everything he says about the government's asylum policy. There are two issues. First, should a regular presenter be restricted from political comment outside the confines of their role, in the interests of public broadcast impartiality? The answer is obvious, and you would have thought that the BBC had learnt its lesson when it ended up apologizing for censuring Naga Munchetty for heartfelt comments on Donald Trump's blatant racism, following a public and internal outcry over her treatment. Munchetty's comments were made on a live BBC broadcast. Lineker's comments were off-air on his private social media account. Nobody is in any doubt that the comments are Lineker's rather than the BBC's. Second, how circumspect should anyone be about comparing right wing nationalism with the political ideology of the Nazis? The answer is very. But Lineker has indeed been cautious in his language. I pointed out myself in the lead-up to the...

Boris Johnson is a Pathological Liar

When I was a teenager, our class were caught gambling and the head decided to cane us. He lined us up to ask each child if they were involved. Nobody lied; the idea of dishonesty was much worse than the fear of corporal punishment. Boris Johnson is the exact opposite: a pathological liar; a delinquent who derives psychological satisfaction from the slightest deceit; from getting one over on people. And he covers up any exposed mendacity with further fabrications. He was unanimously found guilty of lying to the Head of State by eleven Supreme Court judges. He was fired from his job as a journalist for a campaign of systematic lies about the EU over a prolonged period and after multiple warnings. He conspired to deceive the nation before the Brexit vote with deliberately misleading financial propaganda, when the Treasury's own forecast for leaving was for significant long-term financial disadvantage. He knowingly lied about the difficulty of getting a Brexit settlement with the EU. W...