Skip to main content

Who Ignores Best-Practice For Coronavirus?

When it comes to preventing the spread of coronavirus, which of the following pairs do you think are most likely to ignore the bio-security advice of the World Health Organization and the government, to fail to admit to themselves that they have the symptoms of the virus and to fail to seek proper timely medical assistance? Would it be those who think we should trust the science (even if patchy), or those who think giving money to Buddhist monks will bring them good fortune? Would it be believers in the germ theory of disease, or believers in the Gaia theory of disease? Those putting trust in physical barriers, or those putting trust in the power of prayer? Those who think that social distancing will protect them, or those who think God will protect them? Those who think a vaccine would help, or those who think reiki will help? Masters students in Respiratory Care, or Masters students in Wellness Training?

I claim that in each case the first group will be more prudent than the second. No, I am not saying that everyone on the rationalist side will follow best practice, nor that everyone in the woo-woo camp will fail to. Just that overall there will be a significant difference. And if I'm right, then you'd expect differential death rates.

The Institute of Fiscal Studies and others have looked at age and geographical factors to predict the coronavirus deaths in BAME people and compared that with actual hospital deaths. The conclusion is stark: there is a disproportionate impact on BAME communities. I don't think anyone is disputing this. As is being widely claimed, systemic injustices in many aspects of British society are likely a factor.

Now I'm going to word this very carefully, because I don't want any misunderstanding. It occurred to me that BAME communities may well be disproportionately in those second groups. I checked the 2011 census data published by the Office for National Statistics for the proportion of people not reporting a religion, and my suspicion is justified. For White British it is 35%. For all others it is 21%. For sub-continental British Asians it is 7%. For Black British it is 15%, and for Black British Africans specifically, it is 9%.

Obviously, the only way to test my suggestion properly would be to know the beliefs of the victims and those around them, which might not be easy. A starting point would be to identify their religious beliefs. I don't know if this information is already collected, but if so, you could see why the government is refusing to publish the reasons found for the impact on the BAME communities. If it is a factor, it would inflame racial tensions, and racists would use the information to blame the communities themselves for their plight. What we should be doing is encouraging everyone to take a more rational approach to things and ditch the cultural nonsense. As I've said before, the starting point should be banning religious indoctrination of minors. It's child abuse.

Popular posts from this blog

Boris Johnson is a Pathological Liar

When I was a teenager, our class were caught gambling and the head decided to cane us. He lined us up to ask each child if they were involved. Nobody lied; the idea of dishonesty was much worse than the fear of corporal punishment. Boris Johnson is the exact opposite: a pathological liar; a delinquent who derives psychological satisfaction from the slightest deceit; from getting one over on people. And he covers up any exposed mendacity with further fabrications. He was unanimously found guilty of lying to the Head of State by eleven Supreme Court judges. He was fired from his job as a journalist for a campaign of systematic lies about the EU over a prolonged period and after multiple warnings. He conspired to deceive the nation before the Brexit vote with deliberately misleading financial propaganda, when the Treasury's own forecast for leaving was for significant long-term financial disadvantage. He knowingly lied about the difficulty of getting a Brexit settlement with the EU. W...
Read more

Rescuing People from Cults

It isn't hard to imagine a child being brought up by parents within a small community of bizarre cult beliefs. The child would initially accept the programming without question no matter how damaging, because that is what small infants are hard-wired to do. Later they might begin to question the ideas, but everyone they know would profess conviction and it is easy to see the difficulty of snubbing their entire community and becoming a social outcast. If we were able to rescue the victim from the grip of the cult, then even as an adult it would be difficult to reverse the damage. We would need to train the critical thinking skills that all cults must suppress to exist. Our efforts might well look like the popular notion of 'brainwashing'. This is precisely what the Chinese are being accused of with the Uighurs. Some are calling it "psychological torture", and even the BBC are calling it "systematic brainwashing". "Wait a minute," you say, "...
Read more

Reducing Regional Funding, and Calling It Levelling-Up

The most important part of addressing regional inequality in the UK is funding. The new UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) is due to launch in April 2022. But what the government seem keen to hide is that this is just a replacement for EU structural funding that will soon end. The EU's European Regional Development Fund and European Social Fund are allocated by looking at per capita GDP by region, and then member state governments have discretionary powers to reallocate some funds between regions. The UK used these powers to reassign some funds from England to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. We also had an agreement for funds to be administered by our devolved governments. These two funds together support innovation and research, information technology, small- and medium-sized enterprises, employment-related projects and vocational skills training, including youth employment, as well as the promotion of a low-carbon economy. For the seven-year tranche of funding 2014-2020, t...
Read more